Advanced Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology Research Center | Prevalence of complications associated with polymer based alloplastic materials in nasal dorsal augmentation: a systematic review and meta analysis

Advanced Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology Research Center | Prevalence of complications associated with polymer based alloplastic materials in nasal dorsal augmentation: a systematic review and meta analysis
| Dec 9 2025
logo

Advanced Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology Research Center

  • Release Date : Jul 23 2024 - 11:39
  • : 119
  • Study time : 1 minute(s)

Prevalence of complications associated with polymer based alloplastic materials in nasal dorsal augmentation: a systematic review and meta analysis

polymer-based alloplastic materials in nasal dorsal augmentation {faces}

Background

Various techniques with different grafts and implants have been proposed to establish a smooth and symmetric nasal dorsum with adequate function. Broadly, two categories of materials have been used in this regard: alloplastic implant materials and autograft materials. The aim of these meta-analyses is to explore the incidence of complications after dorsum augmentation surgery using alloplastic materials.

Materials and methods

After duplication removal 491 papers remained that title and abstract were assessed for eligibility. Regarding the study type, 27 observational studies were included, 21 retrospective and 6 prospective case series. A total of 3803 cases were enrolled in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Result

Twenty-seven articles reported on complications and outcomes of dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty with synthetic materials. In a random-effects model, the weighted mean percentage was 2.75% (95% CI 1.61 to 4.17%). the weighted mean percentage were 1.91% (95% CI 0.77 to 3.54%), 0.72% (95% CI 0.316 to 1.31%), and 0.78% (95% CI 0.43 to 1.24%) respectively.

Conclusion

The widely used alloplasts were expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), high-density polyethylene, and silicone. The total rates for complications, infection, deviation, irregularity, hematoma, extrusion, and overcorrection were 2.75%, 1.91%, 0.72%, 0.70%, 0.78%, and 0.49%, respectively. The revision rate, based on the random effects model, was 6.40% with 95%CI (3.84 to 9.57).

  • Article_DOI :
  • Author(s) : seied omid keyhan,shaqayeq ramezanzade,reza golvardi yazdi,mohammad amin valipour,hamid reza fallahi,mahsa aeinehvand
  • News Group : research,research article
  • News Code : 277933
مدیر سایت
Author:

مدیر سایت

0 Comments for this article

comment

Post your comment:

متن درون تصویر را در جعبه متن زیر وارد نمائید *
Enter your desired term to search
Theme settings